Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Rich Folks On Mars?

Check out the following article: The Dollar's Full-System Meltdown

Years ago, after mulling over the conundrum of how these evil bastards that gut the environment and entire nations for their whims can possibly expect to live in the ruins of the world once they're done with it, I momentarily came to the conclusion that they must be all moving to Mars soon. Obviously they are destroying the planet. They are pushing for Globalisation in order to speed up the process of raping the planet. How can they live here if there's no ozone? No soil? Dioxin in the water? Atomised depleted uranium floating around the globe? Nuclear wastelands?
They can't. No human can.
So where do they go? Mars. Maybe the Moon. Or perhaps they aren't human.

Of course, this is ridiculous. They're actually going to China.

The article linked above (from Information Clearing House) shows the methodical step-by-step plan to destroy America as a financial power. Just look at this "President'’s Working Group of Financial Markets;" Created as a post to oversee planning for financial emergencies, they are now meeting
every six weeks! The only possible interpretation (without further details) is that something wicked this way comes. And soon.

So North America has nearly been gutted. After this, look for the Illuminazis to move HQ to China, which will becone the "New USA," in other words, the new "World's Leading Economy." What most Americans don't realise is that their National Park system was created to hold the land as collateral for foreign (mainly Chinese) investors. When default time comes (any day now) guess who will own Yellowstone National Park? Yow-Ghi Bear, anyone?

Of course, the stalwart, sturdy, and
well-armed American citizen is going to be pissed when they find out how they were sold down the river. Uprising is likely. It is in this eventuality that we can see the real reasons for Abu Gharib and Gauntanamo Bay: the legal framework for ignoring habeas corpus and the Posse Comitatus Act has been created and solidified.
And as far as armed revolt goes, even the Colonial Brits didn't have the foresight to build Detention Centres all over the New World - The USA
does have detention centres ready for its own population built by Kellogg, Brown & Root - the Halburton subsidiary that got all the no-bid cpntracts to build military bases in Iraq (then bilked the US out of millions by over-charging).
Martial Law procedures were tested out for the first time in New Orleans by FEMA and the military during the Katrina "crisis" when National Gaurd and Army went house-to-house removing people's guns. Only. No rescues, no help, just forced entry and removal of all weapons.

So rise up all you want, Yanks. It won't go like it did in 1776.

It seems obvious to me now that the elite will turn North America into a penal colony / labour camp to mine natural resources (that are secretly under the ground in the National Parks) and provide cheap "services" for Asia.

This is all coming down the pipes faster than any of us thought. It's almost too late.

What can you do? Here are a few options:

  • Change All of Your Investments Into Precious Metals - NOW.
  • Pay Off All Debt. There are indications that debt will become criminal soon, and will be the justification for imprisonment.
  • Get the Hell outa Dodge. North America is hopeless. Canada and Mexico alike (they are the 51st and 52nd states, respectively, since NAFTA was signed. All corporations of note in both countries are US-. Whatever befalls the US will befall these two sorry nations as well. Find a Location Elsewhere, liquidate your assets and split.
  • Armed Insurrectionn: Good luck with that! When the US military bases are finished in the Middle East, the troops will be coming home. You'll never win.
The coming frost will damage so many. Good luck. My heart is with you all.

Monday, October 16, 2006

Neo-Cons vs. Big Oil... Fractured States

Well looky here:


Before you continue with this post, might I suggest that you run, don't walk, to your local bookstore (while they're still legal) and buy a copy of Greg Palast's excellent book, Armed Madhouse.

We, who humbly consider ourselves on the vangaurd of the so-called "truth movement," must remember that we too can easily fall prey to social traps. Decades of scientific research have shown clearly that the simplest level of your brain likes to sort things into black & white, left & right, etc. Like iguanas.
Humans get a constant stream of "gut" feeling from this so called "lizard brain." They can make us totally aggressive toward something if we fear enough.

Here's a social trap that so called liberals, or "left-wingers" often fall into:

"Practically all rich and powerful folk are working together towards the common goal of dictatorial control of free markets."

Here's one that so called "rightist" or "libertarian" can fall into:

"Free market principles will guide us."

The truth is the opposite in both views. We need to be on guard. Lies and secrets abound. Yet these lies can hold both the seed for our downfall and the singular opportunity to unite our overly-polarised people. Even such disparate elements as right-wing libertarians, left-wing students/hippies, centrists even all the religious... everybody.

Because this secret touches on some of the values that are at the core of how we decide to live our lives and spend our time in our societies. Because in Iraq there is a secret struggle going on that we are not allowed to know about. We can unite at least to put the truth to the common lie.

I'm talking about secrets more secret than were the so called "international scandals" that erupted over torture at Abu Gharib Prison or Haliburton charging $100/bag to do the US Army's laundry (obviously these aren't so secret - we found out about those two).

The secret struggle is actually between the two forces you thought would have been taking each other to the prom: the much-hated neo-cons and Big Oil.
This secret struggle is one that, if we knew about its causes, we woul rise up in revolt (by we, I mean a theoretical "Western" country where each citizen has NOT been socially labotomised by TV or meds).

"But wait," lefties say, "I thought that the neo-cons, especially Bush (Bush is not really a neo-con per se, but rather he is controlled by them) and Cheney were Big Oil Boys from back in the day."
"Their main concern was "securing" the oil in Iraq, wasn't it?" By securing they meant, "selling the oil fields to the highest bidder."

To explain, some Iraqi history is in order. I'd start hundreds of years ago, but I can't: Iraq has only existed as a state for some 80 years.

Iraq is a fictional conglomeration of tribal states that had stood, relatively peacefully, for thousands of years. You had the Kurds, and what became the Shia and Sunni in three vague nation-tribes. Enter the Conquering Brits.

In deep consultation with the Seven Sisters (the 7 Big Oil companies of the day, now further monopolised into 4 companies), the UK gathered all these disparate tribes, with varying loyalties and outlooks, and forced them to become "Iraq." The only thing that has ever held "Iraq" together has been sheer, brute force ever since.

Now that the UK and the Sisters had their "Iraq," you might think that their first priority would be to pump as much liquid gold out of the Iraqi earth as possible - get rich or drill tryin'. Right? Wrong. Iraq has been, since its very inception, forced NOT to pump oil.

Remember, in the corporate religion known as the Free Market "more supply" = "less demand" = "falling prices" = "less profit." "Less profit" = "going to Hell" in the Free Market afterlife. So Big Oil cannot over-flood the market. So, after creating Iraq out of whole cloth, the Seven Sisters, instead of drilling for oil all over their new territory, they instead created the much-vaunted OPEC. This was all pre-arranged and agreed to by all the standard, UN Security Coucil-type nations. Iraq was NOT to produce much oil at all.

"Hunh?!?! OPEC was created BY Big Oil white-boys?! I though that OPEC was the Arab ENEMY! The ones that 'hold us hostage' at the pumps at their turban-shrouded whim?"

Yes - OPEC is the baby of Big Oil. They set quotas. And quotas are what keep oil prices high. The gas lines of the 70s are a great example. Did you know that, at the peak of the crisis of '72, oil reserevs in the USA were down only 2%?!? There was no shortage. It was a money-grab for Big Oil's white boys masked as an angry-Arab attack on the free world.

The neo-cons are actually on the side of those who feel that we are held hostage by the House of Saud and it needs to end. Iraq is their play to destroy Saudi Arabia and OPEC. Invade Iraq, privatise the fileds, and start pumpin'. The glut of oil would destroy OPEC quotas and the decreased prices would bankrupt and fracture Suadi Arabia and OPEC.

Shockingly, Big Oil is the biggest opponent to provatisation of Iraqi - or anyone else's - oil. Big Oil, having set up OPEC, prefer to have a dictator running a state oil company. These tend to just take their blood money and obey OPEC quotas, this keeping prices controllable. Using all the support provided by all the usual players, the neo-cons would sell their Iraq war wrapped up with the War on Terror (the war on an abstract noun). It worked. But Big Oil figured out

So, the big obstacle in the way of the neo-cons truly viable plan was this pesky arrangement with the most powerful countries and CEOs on Earth that Iraq was to have its spigots closed. Sadaam had been messing with the quotas at his whim and was becoming a real thorn in Big OiI's side. He had to go. In regime-change, the neo-cons saw their opportunity to fleece Big Oil.

While the neo-cons do occupy some of the most powerful offices in the world, both private and governmental, it is to be remembered that the neo-cons are a small cabal. In fact, in Reagan's cabinet these gentlemen (Cheney, Wolfowitz, et al) were referred as "the Crazies." The neo-cons have never had 9and still don't have) enough power to overturn international agreements through standard power-wielding techniques. How would they wrest Iraq from the British "arrangement," backed by the most powerful groups on Earth?

The answer: Spoil the merchandise.

Erase "Iraq" and you cannot very well have an "arrangement" with Iraq's government.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Olbermann's Excellent Constitutional Analysis

This piece is chilling in detailing what has been allowed to happen south of the border (and what will undoubtedly face us here in Canada soon).


Sex Rings & NGOs - The Key?

Please check out the following article:


[Ed. Note, July 08, 2007:The above article is, of course, gone now. Disappeared to that place that all articles that actually contain news go. Here is, instead, a link to the actual video of this senator saying the quote: http://www.myleftnutmeg.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3817 Hopefully this link will last.]

This reminds me to remind you all: Make sure that you sit down and watch even some of the interview (you couldn’t possibly watch the whole thing at once, it’s almost 8 hrs long) with Kay Griggs, the whistleblower wife of a colonel in the US Army who was totally in on some freaky mind-control/gay sex ring in the Marines. It’s really hard to see how or why this woman could possibly be making up what she is saying. You’ll see. Freaky shit though, be warned.

PART 1: Kay Griggs Talks: Desperate Wives (Blackmail In US Government 1 of 2)

PART 2: Kay Griggs Talks: Desperate Wives (Blackmail In US Government 2 of 2)

About this Abu Gharob stuff; it sure makes me think when a sitting US senator says,

I saw probably 600 pictures of really gross, perverted stuff… The bottom line was it was sex. . . . It wasn't primarily about torture”

Also from the article: “Asked about pictures showing mistreatment of detainees [at Abu Gharib] mentioned by Amnesty International, Shays said he did not see those images and ‘we also don't know where those could have been from.’”

Those would be the pictures that WE saw. Perhaps we are being fed an outrage to mask an even greater one?

And this senator is defending his comments (which were made yesterday) against an onslaught of counter-attacks by such unexpected sources as Amnesty International.


The insanity of it all allows me to pull a, “Sometimes I wonder if…”

Sometimes I wonder if Amnesty International actually could be a “false-flag” operation? An organization perfectly willing to root out and expose (publicise) what we all agree are “possible” atrocities could avert our gaze and outrage away from something vastly more sinister: like, say, a world-wide, organized sex-ring (possibly Satanic or ritualistic in nature)?

Wouldn’t it be the stroke of genius (for the Satanic sex-ring-ers) to create a massively well-funded Non-Governmental Organistion (NGO) that got lots of press (but not too much – that would be suspicious) for standard torture and political imprisonment atrocities in the world. This actually sets the tone for the debate. Human rights abuses are limited to “standard” reasons and “standard” situations by what Amnesty International spends its time on. Ritualistic sex abuse and other such “fringe” issues would be pushed to the periphery. Amnesty International would now control what defines legitimate forms of not only human rights abuses, but also human rights activism itself.

This, of course, makes no sense. Until, that is, it’s factored in that there are now mountains of evidence, in the form of declassified documents, released archival documents and other anecdotal evidence that so many NGOs actually ensure that the opposite of what they are chartered to achieve, is achieved.

1. What has the Heart & Stroke Foundation achieved but exponentially rising heart disease and stroke rates? Same for Cancer Institute, etc.

2. American Psychiatric Institute presidents openly declaring that they will dissolve the family, foster a society of unlimited individualism. In other words: de-stabilise the very people they are supposed to protect. The burned out husks of humans afterwards become their patients. Has actually been wildly successful in creating the opposite of its outward purpose.

3. Rockefeller Institute: Heavily involved in MASSIVE endowments to the arts and, crucial to the point, education.
Just one example of the Institute creating an “opposite” effect: The Institute’s search for professors to write history books is well documented, with plenty of media interviews and articles (mostly from that time) with the professors who refused to work with the Institute (due to them having actual professional “credibility”, or “principles”): they would not RE-write history as expected by the Institute. Of course they eventually find profs who see things their way or are willing to write whatever to get bills or comfy postings.
Of the hundreds of textbooks the Rockefeller Institute has majority-funded, NONE of them mentions the Khazar Empire, which has long been completely verified by modern archeology to have reigned for hundreds of years in
Eastern Europe, casting a huge influence on the area and many subsequent cultures. Modern Jewry would not exist in its current form without the Khazars. Why is this not worth mentioning in a single Western High School? Especially when we are supposed to be totally tied into Israel’s fate.

4. The NRA shows up the loudest when it needs to create controversy. This swings people over toward gun control, as seen in “Bowling for Columbine.” So the NRA is actually working FOR gun control interests.

As I said, file this all under, “Sometimes I wonder if…” Make of it what you will.

Welcome to Disobedia.

This Blog has been created for those who wish access to real information culled from all sources available today. It is inrtended as a direct counter-source to what I call the Obedia: the mainstream mass media that we all "know" and "trust."
Through researching unrelated material, it has come to my attention that there is simply no way that any of the major broadcast media could possibly be honest. All major newspapers, radio stations and, most important, television stations are now owned by 5 multi-national corporations.

The Obedia obey their orders and publish only one side of the story, dissemnating fear, distrust and hate throughout the land. The end result of over 100 years of this is a deluded and ignorant peoples, unable to see the truth, let alone face it.

If the "mainstream" media are the Obedia, then this blog will cull the best of the Disobedia and include my conclusions.

I have never been one for writing letters to the editor and such, but I have crossed a line and can no longer sit idly by while my world is stolen from under me. As I post, some may actually read what is posted. Great. Some may disagree. Great. Send me your views. As Bush said, "Bring it on!" I am not looking for a monopoly on the truth, but rather debate; informed debate based solely upon the facts. Real facts.

There are those woh would argue that there is no such thing as "fact" or "truth" - that these are subjective. It has been my experience that anyone who holds to this view has something to hide. How can it be that the World Trade Center buildings BOTH collapsed due to jet-fuel fires AND due to explosive charges? It can't. One of those scenarios is a FACT. Only somone with an agenda would state that either scenario could be a "fact," depending on your faith or political alignment.

This is horse-hockey and must be rejected out-of-hand if we are to get anywhere.

The whole point here is to question what is happening and to actively seek out the other side of the story - what the Obedia are supposed to have been doing all along.

If they won't do it - we, the people will.

If the government won't govern, we, the people will.

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
John 8:32