Harvard Tars & Feathers Lou Dobbs

Harvard's view on Lou Dobbs' resignation:

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2009/11/17/dobbs-american-cnn/

Now, I am not about to get excited either way about any talking head on the "news," let alone champion Lou Dobbs - but there was something happening with Dobbs: He was ranting on about the evils of globalisation, North American Union, the Amero, the dangers if mass, auto-citizenship for illegal immigrants, the questionable US citizenship of Obama and a few other issues which I suddenly found myself almost aligned with Dobbs on! Shockingly!

Starting a couple years ago, I wondered how long he'd be allowed to go on with that line of attack on his show. He was also an original, major investor/stockholder in CNN, which is why, I assume, he was able to get away with dealing with some real topics for this long!

What's amazing to watch here is the beautifully worded, subtle attack on Dobbs' sanity and character by the Harvard Crimson. When faced with uncomfortable issues, these methods are the only available if there is some truth to the opponent's views. Notice, not a single moment spent on the potential validity of his points... No, that just wouldn't do.

Instead we are told that, "For several years now, doubts have arisen as to whether Dobbs can separate fact from opinion, and even fact from misinformation." The Crimson doesn't have to say whose "doubts?" they are referring to. There's no need. Everyone knows about the "doubts" surrounding Dobbs' views, right?

Or did you know that "...Dobbs often pandered to conspiracy theories?" Of course you did. Everyone knows that! And did you know that the questions over Obama's birthplace (and, thus, eligibility for the presidency) were, "...factually bankrupt ?" Seems to me that, until Obama produces unequivocal proof of US birth, the idea that he is a natural-born American is, "factually bankrupt."

So, like him or no, Lou Dobbs is off TV (for now) and the only mainstream media vehicle on which an American (or Canadian or Mexican for that matter) could ever hear about any of the above issues at all.

It's OK America. Now the big, bad Dobbs is gone and you can go back to your TVs rest assured that there will be no more troubling news or, most important, questions about your government. And no dissent (which is such a nuisance, really).

Random Assassination

RANDOMLY watching late local news on US station (WDIV 4 NBC) and they're character-assassinating some senator called Monica Conyers?!

It's wild to watch it happening real-time. They're using a tone of voice that sounds like CSI agents... the reporters sound disgusted just talking about her... And she's going to jail!

BUT, watching their evidence for 12 straight minutes (forever on modern TV media) , I am still confused as to what Conyers had done..?

And where are these Dirty News pieces on all the billionaire CEOs who daily do all the things that they showed Conyers doing and worse!

J

This Is What We're Separated For?!

I'm sure many of you harbour secret and growing dread about our so-called public education system. I know I do.

First, it seems that the schools cannot make a distinction between reality and movies - with most schools' denizens hell-bent on trying to recreate the social scenes portrayed in Pretty In Pink or DeGrassi High. Or The Hills. And it's not just the students - teachers and administrators buy into this, "popular/unpopular kid" model and thus reinforce it!

Second, there's the content. History is written by the victor. Since we (The West) have been having most of the victories for the last few centuries, it's hardly surprising that our kids are getting a skewed, distorted an self-serving version of all events from the time of the last Ice Age on.

Add to this the fact that EVERY textbook in the Western school system has been correlated and published by or for giant NGOs directly affiliated with the world's richest and oldest-moneyed families... And how could we possibly expect to get a fair view of science, history, politics or religion?!

My 14-yr old daughter will tell anyone who'll listen: "I haven't learnt anything for three years!" how bad is that?!

Add to this the fact that, right when evidence is peaking that vaccines are bad for you, they're trying to vaccinate our children more and more each year, with vaccines that are barely even tested anymore! Human Pampaloma Virus?!? Hep A,B,C?!? Bird Flu! SARS?
With HPV especially, this makes no sense. The viral theory of cancer is just that: a theory. And, despite decades of research, no proof has ever been found that cancer is a virus or can be caused by a virus - just statistcal correlations - which could be due to some other shared factor among test subjects.

Home schooling is legal and I'm moving my kids home ASAP.


-- Post From My iPhone

War: Then and Now

What do you rememeber of advertisements from the war in the 40s? How do they compare to advertisemenets in wartime now? What effect do they have on our outlook as a country? How could this effect (if any) be used to influence - even control - the path a country takes, domestically and internationaly?

I remember being taught that the women and able-bodied men left behind at home had to work for the government. They had to sacrifice part of their career to the war effort of building war machines and ammunition. They also were expected to buy war bonds - because the US had bankrupted itself.

Nowadays, the American President himself issues the first instruction: "Keep Shopping!" No need for war bonds - the Federal Reserve simply prints more worthless paper money to buy more arms.

How has your life changed since the war in Afghanistan started? Iraq? How about during the invasion of Panama? Or the British invasion of the Falklands?
Nothing changes at home. For the soldier away in the field, everything changes. When they come back, they will be horribly misunderstood and estranged.

And so it goes...

Many of us protest these illegal war-actions - but what do we sacrifice to put an end to it?

There's a certain kind of "sacrifice" as shown on tv:
"duty to your country," "police work," "public service,"
etc.

The kind of sacrifice that asks that you give up your elecric salad slicer or Sham-Wow is never mentioned. 'Cos now we have Worldwide War spending and no reduction in luxury spending. It doesn't add up. The bill comes due. Always.

By the end of next year, the bill will come due. The North American currenecies will nosedive. Inflation will take over. THEN they will be calling for "sacrifice." Sacrifice your job, your house, your pension.

-- Post From My iPhone

Foreign Energy Dependence, WWI and Other Myths...

For the heck of it, I was reading the News Channel on my Nintendo Wii (yes, it gives you the news). Top headline: Canada to Talk Oil Sands With Obama.

Obama's officially in-office next Tuesday. One of the first things he will do is come to Canada to talk Alberta Oil Sands. Obama's dedicated to "ending USA's dependence on Middle East Oil." This is hilarious when you know what's really going on and how 'Middle East oil' and our supposed 'dependence' on it were actually created.

By now, you'd think more people would know that Saudi Arabia is called the United States of Arabia by everyone living in the Middle East - and that this 'dependence' has been worked out to be this way! But no, they keep using it as a kicking-horse. Insane.

For those of you that require some history to see through this farce:

In the years leading to WWI, the massive oil reserves across the Middle East were being discovered and coveted by the emerging trans-national oil megalopolies. Contrary to popular thought, it was never just the vast quantities of oil that drew foreign investment, but rather the attraction of not having to pay living wages to workers combined with the existence - or the ease of setting up - Islamic dictatorships to 'stabilise' and control said workers and oil fields.
WWI was conducted mostly as an operation to redraw the Middle East in an image that maximised internal conflict and foreign control of the land. That objective was clearly achieved. Did you know that Britain started the Great War by invading... Iraq! Did you even know that? I sure as Hell didn't. I thought it was all about Archduke Ferdinand - just like you did. So why invade Iraq first?

The sheer scope and insanity of WWI brought all the nations to the table to prevent such conflicts in the future.

But it was not all smooth sailing for the globalist elites right away - the League of Nations - an essential piece of the plan - failed. Back then, nations were used to something called sovereignty and could easily see through the rich, white man's plans for world dominance. The League never really got off the ground.
But there were plenty of successes - plans for the creation of Israel bring fruit - the Balfour Declaration was procured from England (then-controllers of Palestine). And note this is 25 years before the 'Holocaust!'

A One-Two punch ensued next - and these would cement forever the elitist stranglehold on all of our lives: The so-called Great Depression. That's the One-Punch. The Two-Punch was WWII. After WWII, they got their League of Nations back under the name United Nations - owned and run, lock-stock-and-barrel by the Rockefellers (and whomever they actually answer to).

During all this, in the background, the Middle East was being cut up and parceled out to the highest bidders. This was conveniently invisible to the average citizen, because we didn't know of the Middle East's energy deposits yet!

The Saudi kingship in Arabia is a puppet government. Set up from day one as US stooges. This is why they are so hated by their own citizenry. They're considered foreigners! Read Confessions of an Economic Hitman (or watch hi lecture here) to get the dirt on this.
Once the Transnational oil companies did the math (pay union wages and US land-rights rates to US workers and State governments - or pay crap wages to Saudis with totalitarian regimes to keep control) they abandoned major US operations and moved to the Middle East.
So any 'stranglehold' that Saudi Arabia has on oil is an engineered one. Don't believe the hype. If cheap oil was really wanted, it's waiting for us here - in the US and Canadian mainlands! We have more oil here than the rest of the world combined! Don't believe me? Watch this video.

We're really going to have to watch this Presidency for passage of the elitist, globalist UN initiatives that have been festering behind the scenes for the last few years. When you look at the last five Presidencies, you see an emerging pattern of oscillation back and forth between 'right' and 'left.' Reagan and the Bushes can be seen to 'turn down' UN initiatives - giving conservative voters the idea that they give a hoot about US sovereignty. Then in come the Democrats - Carter, Clinton, Obama - to shove through the worst of the initiatives in the name of 'change' and 'peace.'
I predict openly that all the craziest theories about the UN (CODEX Alimentarius, de-population, internment camps, international military police) will go through with Obama. Just like Clinton.

AFTERWORD:

Is it just me or is it becoming impossible to hear one single word of truth in any mainstream press article? They're just comedic pieces now! After all this BS about foreign oil dependence, they then go on to say that digging up the oil sands will "increase [Alberta's] greenhouse gas emissions." How?!?

I guess this is "Change." Say, I had forgotten... but what was Clinton's catch phrase when he was running after George HW? "It's time for Change." Har!!!

And after looking into it for a few days, it seems that Obama is most likely:

A) The illegitimate son of a targeted Black Panther leader and his mother (who seems to have been a hired spy for the US govt who "penetrated," literally, the Black Panthers under COINTELPRO)

B) A foreign-born illegal alien. Raised in secret and groomed since birth to be President of the US.

C) Working for the Chicago Mob. If you can't beat them, join them! What better way to conduct criminal operations but to hold control of the law?

Either way, we do know he appears out of nowhere, fully developed, like Ancient Egypt rising out of the Nile, to claim a state senate seat by getting all of his opponents disqualified from the ballot (sound familiar? Like a Mob operation?) then wins the US Senate seat, then raises a half-billion dollars instantly to grab the Presidency. Hmmmm. And, oh yeah, he cannot / will not provide Birth Certificates or any other identity papers to Congress. And they're just going to sign him in next week as Prez - they don't even know if he's American!!!

Original Oil Sands Article: AP

South Ossetia - Israeli Air Base?!?

My friends and I had been trying to figure out this latest 'conflict' in Georgia's South Ossetia... I must admit, that, while I do not find sabre-rattling at Russia surprising (the only time that the USA treated Russia kindly was when Boris Yeltsin allowed the USA and its allies to rape Russia!) - We sure did not see this one coming.

After Georgia went into Ossetia, Russia attacked Georgian troops, and the US & NATO countries decried and threatened Russia, as I tried to come up with angles, I thought to myself,

• 1) Perhaps Iran and North Korea - even the War On Terror - had been distractions and they've really been pining all along for a revival of the old, Cold War with Russia.
• 2) This flare up in Russia is a distraction from something else that we should be paying attention to
• 3) The Georgian president is a CIA asset (Like Karzai of Afghanistan, he speaks perfect English, went to US college paid for by the State Dept. and was a lawyer in New York who worked to "recruit" ex-pat Georgians for political movements back home.

Turns out that 2 and 3 are closest - though I don't rule out a complete return to a demonised Russia.

Read the excellent article below:

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13401

Israel was using South Ossetia as a staging ground to bomb Iran!?!? Now, that makes some sense out of Russia's invasion.

Remember: There are no "surprises" in world events.

If You Had Any Doubts That You Were Alone In All This...

ARTICLE: Corrs guitarist: 9/11 was an inside job

Who woulda thunk? From such a non-threatening, mainstream band!

I'm amazed that they didn't slander him. They certainly didn't support his statements, but, for once, they just presented the views and let the object of the article be. A previously unaware reader might even be tempted to look into Corrs's allegations - seeing as how they didn't rip into him as a "conspiracy theorist."

I figure it's because it's Belfast. The Irish have known since the Potato Famine (probably since the time of the druids, actually!) that there are giant conspiracies afoot. Talk of government conspiracy is probably family dinner conversation over there after 100s of years of the Brits messing with them.

For instance, almost all of the people indicted in high-profile group terror/conspiracy arrests and detentions in Northern Ireland from the 1970s and 80s have, after an unimaginably long stay in brutal prisons, have not only been exonerated, but much evidence has come to light that they were framed by MI5 and the British Military in (the now-familiar) false-flag operation (for instance, Operation Stakeknife in which dozens of UK citizens were allowed to die in terror attacks organised by their own mole).

The casualness of the Belfast Times article reminds me of how, when one interviews inner-city blacks in the US, a perfectly normal response would be, "Of course there's a giant conspiracy! They're stealing our votes, they're killing our leaders!"

Despite the establishment's constant lamenting that blacks are among the poorest, most under-educated people in America, they're actually some of the best-educated people in America! It's just been a very hard lesson that they have had to learn. Same goes for the Irish fighting for their rights under the heel of the British occupation.

“There’s a good reason why nobody studies history, it just teaches you too much.” - Noam Chomsky